Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 05:27

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
China Housing Demand to Stay at 75% Below Peak, Goldman Says - Bloomberg
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Is it possible to revive a dead person in real life with black magic?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Terraforming Mars Might Actually Work and Scientists Now Have a Plan to Try It - ZME Science
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 163 — The Trials of Starship - Space
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
People Are Being Involuntarily Committed, Jailed After Spiraling Into "ChatGPT Psychosis" - Futurism
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Lawsuit says mayor called people who opposed Buc-ee's project 'terrorists' - 9News